Windows 8 on ARM Shows Weakness, Not Strength

No support for current Windows applications. Office is still desktop-only. Windows on ARM (WOA) is a compromised “no-compromise experience” at a time when Microsoft needs to show more strength.

I am referring to the new details out of Microsoft regarding Windows on ARM, the version of Windows 8 that will run on low-powered ARM processors. People were hoping this could bring the power of Windows in an iPad-like form factor. Instead the best we’re going to get is a Windows-like environment on a tablet. Yay.

“Real” Windows

First and foremost, WOA isn’t “real” Windows. By that, I mean no support for those thousands of applications that currently run on what people know as Windows. No support for emulation or porting either. Any existing app will need to be coded from scratch for the Metro environment in WOA. It’s a separate member of the Windows family, like Windows Phone.

No, wait, comparing WOA to Windows Phone is imprecise. It sounds more like an update to Windows Embedded Compact 7. Remember Window EC7? It was previously promoted as an option for Windows tablets, but then scrubbed away before it was ever realized. The difference is they have the Metro interface now, but it’s still an embedded solution, not “real” Windows.

No Office for Metro

But at least the embedded solution is reasonable from a technology standpoint. If Microsoft hadn’t been so coy on the issue, no one would have expected WOA to be compatible with existing Windows applications. What’s inexcusable is that Microsoft Office isn’t going to support Metro.

Now, I’m not going to say I didn’t expect this, but the fact that Office has to be entirely recoded for WOA anyway really leaves no excuse for not supporting Metro. Microsoft is betting huge on this interface. The future of the Windows operating system is riding on the success of Metro. One would expect the Office team to support the company on this, yet they still won’t budge from the desktop interface. In fact it seems like Office is the only reason WOA is even maintaining a desktop interface since there’s no apparent path for other application support. Yes, they’re improving the touch interface in Office for WOA, but it’s still a public vote of no-confidence for Metro at a time when MS is trying to promote Metro style apps.

I and plenty of other long-time Windows tablet users have said time and time again that the lack of Office support strangled early Tablet PC efforts. Former Microsoft VP Dick Brass cited this as an example of how internal conflicts at Microsoft derailed innovation. If I wasn’t so used to seeing this stupidity repeat itself, I’d find the situation unbelievable. Instead I simply find it unbearable. No Office for Metro is a failure of leadership on Microsoft’s part, even more conspicuous than what happened with Tablet PCs.

Advertisement

Another OS mouth to feed

What’s really sad about all this is that most of what they’re actually promising with WOA is already available on Windows Phone. Not using Windows Phone as the basis for WOA seems incredibly short-sighted. The main difference is the desktop for Office, but that had to be rebuilt for ARM anyway.

Basically Microsoft is adding yet another operating system to their family of consumer products. There’s Windows for PCs, XBox for home entertainment, Windows Phone for phones, and now WOA for tablets and other devices. Granted, you can still use “real” Windows for home entertainment and tablets, but Microsoft’s product strategy is one that is increasingly fragmented.

In many ways, it’s like 2005 all over again when there were different editions of Windows XP for Tablet PC and Windows Media Center, but without compatibility with the vast Windows app library. Microsoft is trying to bridge that gap with Metro, but it’s got no history backing it, nor does it have the support of Microsoft’s own flagship product.

I previously called Office for Metro the “last mile” in making Windows 8 work, a chance for them to lead by example in getting developers on board with Metro. Now it is still possible that Windows 8 will reverse Microsoft’s decline with PCs and tablets, but without Office for Metro, it’s a far less daring, much less bold move than I think they need.

  

Comments

  1. Maracine Robert says

    Uhm, remember Intel medfield?  U’ll get the full Windows 8 on that, u’ll just have to pay the intel premium.  

  2. Tekno Tavern says

    You have failed to point out the battery life factor if x86 apps ran on a low powered arm processor, plus coding an existing apps x86 for arm does not necessarily mean coding from scratch, its more like tweaking and recompiling.

  3. Maracine Robert says

    Also I won’t mind having to use a special version of Office just for ARM, if it works and gets the job done I’m happy. 

  4. Marcoqui says

    The new windows phone 8 will have the same kernel of WOA and every current windows phone app will run on WOA so microsoft will merge the two line of mobile OS on ARM avoiding fragmentation.
    ARM platform is good in battery life but not good in CPU power, desktop app do not run well on it so it is not possible to use virtual machine or direct port to run x86 apps to WOA.
    For Office on ARM, lets see how is the interface and after that criticize.

  5. Mark Gibbs says

    I can’t wait for WOA and if you don’t want the ARM Processor you can always get the intel version ? I’m not sure what your trying to say other than bashing something good .?

    Oh yea and all new apps developed with WINRT with run on both ARM and Intel ? this is not a bad thing. I would love to see someone port an entire OS with 1.4 bill customers to arm with out a blink of the eye.
    Great job MS..

  6. Dale Strauss says

    Sumo you are right – this is really a travesty. I know Microsoft keeps its divisions separate because of fear of monopoly claims, but this is where Ballmer had to put down the hammer and demanded the Office division get with the program and “Metro” Office 15.

  7. Bill says

    I find this article to be way off base and sadly misinformed. Or is simply the result of a lack of understanding. From a developer’s view this is exactly what is needed. From a consumer’s view we don’t want another “Windows on tablet”; we’ve had that and it was never what we wanted. I for one like where they’re going here.

Leave a Reply