Home Apple Apple Watch vs Microsoft Band: Price & Features

Apple Watch vs Microsoft Band: Price & Features

Earlier today, Apple shocked absolutely no one when it finally shared release date details for the Apple Watch. The company is describing the device as the most personal thing it’s ever created. At its core, the Apple Watch is a companion, a way of extending your iPhone experience outside of your pocket and onto your wrist. It’s an interesting philosophy for sure.

The Apple Watch release date is confirmed. This is what you need to know.

The Microsoft Band is Microsoft’s take on fitness and wearables. Like the Apple Watch, its meant to be a constant companion, a way to stay abreast of the latest messages without pulling out your smartphone. Both devices come preloaded with tons of fitness apps and options too. Here’s how the newly announced Apple Watch compares to the Microsoft Band.

Apple Watch vs Microsoft Band – Design

They both go on your wrists and allow you to do things that a normal watch never could. That being said, the Apple Watch and the Microsoft Band are really different. These differences are immediately noticeable. Just look at both of them.

Apple Watch glances

The core of the Apple Watch is a machined aluminum rectangle with curbed edges. The exact specifications, like weight and display size specifically depend on the version that users pick up. For example, versions for smaller wrists have a 1.32-inch display. Apple Watches for bigger wrists have 1.5-inch displays. The cheapest version — and probably the one most users will pick up —  is Apple Watch Sport. It comes in silver and space gray with a sport wristband in either White, Black, Blue Green or Pink. There are leather and stainless still band options for the mid-range Apple Watch, which starts at $549.99.  Even more options come with the $10,000 Apple Watch Edition.

Microsoft-Band

The Apple Watch is a wearable built for style and function. The Microsoft Band is everything but. Really, the device is as nondescript as a wearable can be. There’s only one color: black. Microsoft opted to keep the style simple. It has a rectangular display instead of a square or circular one. This screen measures 33mm x 11mm. That’s all the usable space users get. It is a touch screen display though.

Apple Watch vs Microsoft Band – Internals & Apps

The differences in these two devices is even more noticeable when you get to down their internals. The Microsoft Band boasts an optical heart rate sensor, accelerometer and gyroscope, gyrometer, GPS, ambient light sensor, skin temperature sensor, UV sensor, capacitive sensor, galvanic skin response monitor and microphone. All of these sensors are so the Microsoft Band can monitor fitness activity. The GPS sensor, for example lets users track their run without necessarily having to carry around their smartphone. Bluetooth 4.0 is how the Microsoft Band communicates with iOS, Android and Windows Phones with the Microsoft Health app. There are apps for running, sleep tracking, guided work outs and  heart rate monitoring. There are some productivity features like Email, weather, notifications, timer, stopwatch, caller ID, Twitter, Facebook Messenger and Calendar. Gold’s Gym and Runkeeper are among Microsoft’s fitness app partners.

microsoft band

The Apple Watch doesn’t just dabble in being a full-on wearable computer like the Microsoft Band. The only sensors it has are an accelerometer, gyroscope, heart rate sensor and barometer. In connects with iPhones using Bluetooth 4.0 and also has built-in Wi-Fi. There’s a touch screen, but also a crown that lets users navigate the interface. It’s charged with a wire connection-less plug that simply snaps into place.

Apple Watch send Heartbeat

Interchangeable faces are just one of the many software features the Apple Watch boasts. Users can add any data to their watch face that they want. Health and Fitness apps allow it to also keep track of user’s workouts, monitor how long users have sat and comes complete with an activity guide of its own. In addition to that, any app developer can create an app for Apple Watch, something that’s not necessarily true of the Microsoft Band. Target, Nike+ and MLB already have apps coming for the Apple Watch. So does CNN, NPR and even car maker BMW. The built-in NFC system allows iPhone 5s users to use the Apple Pay service without upgrading to an iPhone 6 or iPhone 6 Plus.

You can send a drawing to a friend or message someone nearby with an Apple Watch. Monitoring messaging is possible to. The Apple Watch’s most impressive feature might just be its ability to let wearers take phone calls directly from their wrist.

Apple Watch vs Microsoft Band – Conclusion

It’s not really a case of the Apple Watch clearly being better than the Microsoft Band. Which you should buy depends on what kind of experience you’re looking for. The Microsoft Band is first a fitness band. Sure, you can check your calendar or pay for something at Starbucks with it, but really it’s meant as a companion to a workout. It gets 48 hours of battery life, and it only costs $199 too, making it an obvious choice for entry-level buyers on iPhone, Android and Windows Phone.

Read: Apple Watch Release Date Confirmed

The Apple Watch is a wrist-computer and its 18 hours of battery life prove it. That being said, what users are getting for $349 isn’t like anything we’ve seen before. It’s a computer, a tiny computer that users can customize to their heart’s content. If that’s sounds like a watch you’d buy, your choice is obvious: go with the Apple Watch. Potential buyers will be able to try the Apple Watch on April 10th at an Apple Store.

Load More In Apple

7 Comments

  1. Sholokov

    03/09/2015 at 9:44 pm

    It’s interesting how you mention these two products being two different categories and then recommend Apple watch over Band. The way I see and understand it is, wear Band during your exercise, outdoor activity or to work and then wear Apple watch when you go out in the evening with family or to party.

    Can’t seem to understand the logic of buying one over the other. It’s like my car vs my truck. Each with its own purpose and each does it right.

    Reply

  2. bill

    03/10/2015 at 6:47 am

    > something that’s not necessarily true of the Microsoft Band.

    The Microsoft Band does allow any developer to create apps for it now that the preview SDK has just been released.

    Reply

  3. drake

    03/10/2015 at 10:15 am

    Yeah, no, sorry. The Band is a pretty slick little gadget, which I use to tell the time, get notifications (email, facebook, and texts in my case, but there are plenty of options), set reminders via Cortana, and reply to text messages. It too has a magnetic charger that snaps into place. Also very water resistant.

    It is a wrist computer, and you’re just going to have to deal with that fact.

    The Apple watch, meanwhile, is a watch that has some computer flavoring, various gimmicks, and terrible battery life.

    Reply

  4. Mark Binder

    03/10/2015 at 11:23 am

    Nicely said drake! The Apple Watch MIGHT get a day’s use out of it, while my Microsoft Band can EASILY get 2 1/2 + days without a charge! I monitor my sleep 2 nights in a row and still have enough to get me through the workday before charging it on the 3rd day. Also, the author forgot to mention that Microsot recently added the ability to use the keyboard on the screen of the Microsoft Band. I can reply to text message either verbally or if in a meeting, via on-screen keyboard.

    Reply

  5. Chris

    03/12/2015 at 7:05 pm

    I’m sure I’ll read a lot more of these biased articles that your the benefits of the I watch without mentioning similar benefits for the Microsoft band or Android watches. It’s also worth mentioning that the I watch is a watch replacement, since nobody would wear an I watch and a Swiss watch. The band on the other hand can be worn with a Swiss watch, as I do. I love my watch and have no intention of wearing two watches or replacing my Swiss watch with a geeky digital watch.

    Reply

  6. Elise

    03/17/2015 at 8:15 pm

    I can’t believe how biased this author is. This is supposed to be a comparison, yet instead of comparing both of their similar features side to side, you completely skip talking about the Microsoft band. I love how at first you talk about all that the band has as far as sensors, and then next you say how the apple watch only has like 1/4 of that, yet at the end of the article you go on saying that its “like a computer”.. I’m sorry.. How does it make sense to call the apple watch a computer, when the band can do more?
    Especially considering that the Microsoft band can connect to ANY smart phone, unlike the apple watch that can only connect to phones.
    Oh, and the fact that the apple watch only had about 18 hours battery life, yet the band has about 2 1/2 days.
    But yeah.. The apple watch is the one that is “computer-like”.. *rolls eyes*

    Reply

    • Elise

      03/17/2015 at 8:17 pm

      *Edit*
      Can only connect to Iphones

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *