Editorials
Fallout 4 Release: 5 Things to Know Right Now
Fallout 4 in Boston | ||||||
 | ||||||
Bethesda hasn't confirmed anything about the game though rumors suggest that the game's setting will be Boston. The developer reportedly took a scouting trip to the city in 2012 and Kotaku's leaked documents all but confirm the city as the game's setting. While it's not confirmed, the city does make sense given its close proximity to Washington D.C., the setting for Fallout 3. The documents make reference to MIT and other locations like The Commonwealth. The Commonwealth has been mentioned in other Fallout games but it hasn't never been shown off. | ||||||
| ||||||
TheLoneCourier
05/28/2015 at 4:51 am
“Fallout: New Vegas though that game wasn’t considered a true successor to Fallout 3”
Is this in the same way GTA:SA wasn’t considered a true successor to GTA3? Or perhaps how Code Veronica wasn’t considered a true successor to Resident Evil 3?
I would love to know what criteria you use to decide what is and isn’t a ‘true successor’.
Same gameplay. Same universe. Same canon. Same mechanics. Heck FNV is basically FO3 recoloured.
It would seem the author has confused his personal preferences with reality.
TheRealestCourier
05/28/2015 at 5:28 am
Nigga it was made by obsidian bruh that’s why it’s not a true successor
nuke them
05/28/2015 at 1:58 pm
Well I hate to tell you this but obsidian is who originally created fallout but then Bethesda bought it after obsidian went belly up then Bethesda made fallout 3 and Bethesda and ppl who worked with obsidian on the original fallout’s helped them create fallout new Vegas it’s not actually made by obsidian
Jesse
05/28/2015 at 10:50 pm
Actually “bruh” it was originally created by interplay in the 90’s now stop your bickering and go play some more fallout
Micky T
05/28/2015 at 8:43 am
Awful, truly awful.
5 things you need to know about stuff.
1 – it is possible
2 – Things are involved
3 – People may or may not know about things
4 – Future things may come but nobody can guarantee them
5 – Other details
What the hell is this supposed to be? Are you paid to write this?
Much love but not really.
Jacob Schafer
05/28/2015 at 8:54 am
Boston, Massachusetts, is absolutely not a “close proximity” to Washington D.C., simple geography.
Slide 4/5 by the way.
Ben Loosey
05/28/2015 at 11:17 am
Yes actually, Boston is in close proximity to DC. As opposed to say, Orlando, fl or Houston, tax or Vegas. In that respect Boston and DC are practically neighbors.
Trav
05/28/2015 at 8:54 pm
Jizz. That is All.