Connect with us


The iPad is the Next iPod…And Then Some



While a lot of companies have made promises about media tablets this year, Apple’s the only one to sell such a device in any real volume. There are some Android tablets hitting the market and the BlackBerry Playbook was recently introduced. But for the time being, Apple’s the only one out there with a cohesive product that everyday consumers are actually buying and using.

Forget about  the iPad’s features, operatings systems, apps and specs  for a moment. When consumers now see slate devices the first the first thing that pops into their minds is ‘iPad.’ When companies show us media tablets, they stress how and why  it’s better than the iPad. When manufacturer’s documents are leaked, we see that the iPad is being used as a benchmark.

My hometown of San Francisco is chock full of iPad users. My dad’s plumber uses an iPad to invoice clients before leaving their homes. Door to door salespeople are using iPads in our neighborhood to sell services to small businesses. People are even using iPads to sell doughnuts. Kids are playing with iPads just about everywhere. I brought my iPad to AT&T Park for a Giants playoff game to keep an eye on stats and I wasn’t the only one. iPads are popping up at my friends’ weddings in lieu of paper notes for speeches. I can’t step foot in a cafe without seeing at least one iPad being used.

Our friend Kevin Tofel from jkOnTheRun came out to San Francisco to help host Mobilize 2010 and he was amazed that ‘everyone has an iPad.’ He even snapped photos of the jumbo iPad billboard downtown for his son because they don’t have building-sized Apple ads back in Pennsylvania.

San Francisco area residents’ tech buying habits aren’t typical compared to the rest of the country, but they are a pretty good early indicator of which products will succeed and fail. We’re generally on the leading edge of the buying curve. I remember back when the iPod was first gaining popularity and there was a disconnect between my friends/family that lived in the area and those that lived elsewhere. While people in the area were snatching up early versions of the iPod like hotcakes, those elsewhere were skeptical and said they were content with their portable CD players. Fast forward a few years and we all know how that turned out.

So what do I mean when I say that the iPad is the next iPod? I think consumers (and many businesses) are generalizing all slate devices as ‘iPads’, much the same way a lot of people refer to all personal media players as iPods. Even as new Android, Palm and Windows consumption tablets come out, the iPad will be the starting point for most people. In consumers’ minds it’ll be iPad vs. everything else. If they determine they don’t want an iPad, they’ll go look at everything else. I wouldn’t be surprised if we started seeing iPad versions of sites like pop up.

The iPod had more than its fair share of competition. In fact, many of the competing personal media players were better on paper. They often had more storage, could play more audio formats and had features like FM tuners. They were also cheaper than Apple’s iPods. But how many kids listed a Creative or Microsoft media player on their Christmas wish lists?

The situation with the iPad is similar. Samsung, HP, RIM and many others are readying competitive devices, but consumers are already digging the iPad. What should be even more worrying to everyone buy Apple is that the iPad is making serious inroads in the enterprise.

Companies like are taking the iPad seriously, offering up apps so its millions of users can use the iPad to collaborate on deals and projects. It’s companies like salesforce that are the ‘then some’ that I referenced in the headline of this article. It would be pretty difficult for most salespeople, executives, engineers and other office workers to expense an iPod. But a $499 device that can help you communicate with customers, sell more widgets or access corporate databases is something that a lot of bosses would be glad to approve.

I spoke with SAP CIO Oliver Bussmann recently and he told me that his company is using about 1,500 iPads. To put that in perspective, the software giant has about 17,000 BlackBerry devices on its network. It took RIM years to build up that number of users at SAP, but in 5 short months Apple’s managed to equip nearly 10% of SAP’s mobile users with iPads. That’s with a first-gen product and before iOS4, with its improved corporate features, has shown up.

Bussmann said that for a slate to be successful int he enterprise it needs to be able to wake instantly, 10 hours or more of battery life and a 7 to 9-inch display. He explained that a relatively simple device like the iPad allows him to run complex reports, such as one system that has 4TB of in-memory data and a database that’s over 40TB.

Bussman explained that the PlayBook would be easier and possibly cheaper to deploy than the iPad, but that doesn’t necessairly mean SAP will equip thousands of users with PlayBooks.

“As a software company we want to be device agnostic in which devices we use and the devices we support,” Bussman said. “From a system integration perspective, this out of the box BlackBerry Server support sends a strong message.”

Unique features like BlackBerry integration are probably iPad alternative’s biggest strengths. But again, the PlayBook is a device that nobody has played with and there are questions as to if there’s even a working prototype yet.

Another thing to think about is that the only thing keeping Apple from selling more iPads is its manufacturing limitations. I spoke with an Apple employee who said selling them isn’t the problem, meeting demand is. Here in the U.S. it’s relatively easy to grab an iPad, especially now that Target and Wal-Mart are jumping on board. But there are many locations around the world that are back ordered.

Apple employees do not feel intimidate by the PlayBook at all. When I asked if the Playbook would eat into iPad sales I was met with a bit of laughter.

Another thing to remember is that Apple isn’t standing still. While others are waiting for Android 3.0 (Gingerbread), Apple is getting ready to unleash its second version of the iPad operating system and will surely announce a new version of the iPad before Android devices start shipping in any real volume.

Is the iPad the best and will it continue to be the best? I’m not so sure. But to the average consumer, the iPad is the only show in town and it’s good enough.

What do you think? Will the PlayBook, Galaxy Tab and other devices break out in the coming months or will the iPad become the next iPod.



  1. dstrauss

    10/11/2010 at 8:09 pm

    I think you’ve hit the mark. Although I have gone back to my tablet PC (HP 2730p) I see the iPad as sweeping the field much as the iPod did. It is that iTunes ecosystem combined with the “coolness” factor (what can I say, iPod looks like Jobs designed it, iRiver et al look like Ballmer’s handywork). I liked my iPad, but it truly was not ready for my pedestrian business needs – and my love for inking. My mind may change with ipad 2…

    • Xavier Lanier

      10/11/2010 at 9:10 pm

      The 2730p is obviously a completely different and more capable than the iPad, but when I use one in public I’m asked why my iPad looks so fat. When I explain it’s from HP reactions run along the lines of “when did HP start copying the iPad?”

      • Dodot

        10/12/2010 at 12:09 am

        Hahaha! Brand hegemony is fascinating. I enjoyed reading this article Xavier. Maybe if time permits, you or somebody else from the GBM team could write more about the Ups and Downs of the Apple brand. Specifically, about the shifts in perception, vis-a-vis innovation leadership. Jobs and co. are kings and queens of the hill now, with their i(Fill-in-the-blank) and of course their Mac(Fill-in-the-blank). But not too long ago they were floundering in terms of their cultural standing.

        I remember watching Jeff Golblum using a Macbook to stop the Alien Invaders in Independence Day. I also remember seeing Sarah Jessica Parker type on a Macbook as Carrie Bradshaw in Sex and the City. But by both those times the perception must have already shifted.

      • dstrauss

        10/12/2010 at 2:40 pm

        I get the same reaction – except (drumroll) – it is always followed with “I didn’t know you could write on an iPad!” which launches into a long discussion of the wonders of Tablet PC and OneNote. Unfortunately, I just don’t think we are at the stage, technology wise, to give that same smooth inking experience on an iPad size/battery life device with Windows 7. I hope the HP Slate proves me wrong…and continuing to beat a dead horse, I don’t care if it is “sluggish” running Powerpointless; just give me OneNote 2010 and a 5 hour battery – I’ll do the rest.

  2. RJ

    10/11/2010 at 8:22 pm

    “I think consumers (and many businesses) are generalizing all slate devices as ‘iPads’, much the same way a lot of people refer to all personal media players as iPods. ”

    This was my initial fear when the Ipad came out. But its not just slate devices but all tablets. Even convertable Tablet PCs used in Tablet mode are just chaucked up the general consumer as an Ipad.

  3. Jackjack

    10/11/2010 at 9:09 pm

    I doubt it

    Android will be huge, windows will be huge and apple will be huge.

    the form factor is nice, and there is room for all. the incentive for corp to lock into a single vendor is almost nil.

    android and windows offer a way to avoid the full lock in.

    • Xavier Lanier

      10/11/2010 at 9:16 pm

      Windows already is huge – no argument there. But how many businesses are using Android slates as of today? Corps lock in to single vendors all the time. It’s difficult to support apps on several OS’s. Of course, cloud services/apps help alleviate that pain.

  4. Jonathan Alligood

    10/11/2010 at 9:24 pm

    I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again. All the iPad needs is Touch & Pen. Then it would be the perfect companian device. I use the Targus Stylus on it now but it still feels wrong. And my writing, though huge in it’s own right is way to large on this screen. Note Take HD makes it alot better. ( And i find my self wishing I had it on my Tablet PC….)

    It also needs more RAM 256 MB I still can’t believe that.

    • Dalekstrauss

      10/12/2010 at 2:49 pm

      That’s what I thought (all my iPad needed was a good Pen inking experience), but I’ve come to believe it is much more than that. In fact, your 256MB RAM comment drives that home – EVERYTHING on the iPad has been optimized towards that 10 hour battery. Extra RAM means more battery drain (for example, my 8gb HP 2730p does use more battery than my previous 4gb configuration, even in sleep mode). So, while a marvel of mobile technology (at least to this old hand), between Stevie’s hatred of all things Newton (stylus) and the quest for power efficiency, the iPad is going to struggle at business intensive tasks (aka inking).

  5. Synergi

    10/11/2010 at 9:27 pm

    I just wish some one will release one with great inking capabilities. I love the form factor. Hp sure did drop the ball with their TC1100.

    • Jonathan Alligood

      10/11/2010 at 9:48 pm

      Same, I love the Form-factor. But wish I could Ink on the thing more intuitively.

    • Jonathan Alligood

      10/11/2010 at 9:48 pm

      Same, I love the Form-factor. But wish I could Ink on the thing more intuitively.

  6. Anonymous

    10/12/2010 at 1:27 am

    I like the idea of Apple grabbing enough mindshare among consumers that when somebody says tablet or slate, the iPad image pops into their heads. Or when somebody has a tablet made by another company, people will say something like, “Oh, do other companies have tablets? I thought only Apple made them.” That’s a sure sign that consumers will go for the iPad and forget about all other companies’ tablet devices.

    I believe Apple can afford to stay at the head of the pack as far as unit sales numbers are concerned, providing that’s Apple’s goal. A cash reserve that will be approaching $50 billion dollars in a week or so allows the sort of leeway that other tech companies can’t possibly match. Basically, Apple can go and take the risks that others would be scared to take. I’m hoping Apple will continue to improve on the quality of it’s products and continue to provide top customer support even if it has to lose market share to the cut-rate companies. Apple doesn’t have to be greedy to be successful as long as they target the right clientele. By greedy, I mean, not to have a goal of putting an Apple product on everyone’s desk or in everyone’s pocket. Targeting 30% – 40% of discerning consumers with good margins should keep Apple rolling for years.

  7. Buy Blank DVD

    12/15/2010 at 8:41 am

    For me the difference between the iPod and iPad is the screen size and resolution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.