Clicky

Consumers Buried Device Specs Years Ago

By  |  5 Comments

Much of the technology press has been going on about the death of the spec. Finally coming to the conclusion that the specs on paper don’t matter as much as the actual device use experience.

It was a bit of a surprise to see a funeral for specs happening this week, because almost every consumer I know had buried specs years ago. Sure, there are geeks like me who like to know about the specs of a device, but the general consumer doesn’t care — partly because specs have become too confusing to use as a comparison of devices and performance.

specs are dead tombstone

Specs are long dead and buried by consumers

Back in March, we called attention to the meaningless state of specs in the tablet wars, and went so far as to claim that specs don’t matter to shoppers. These articles are just seven months old, but specs have been dead for much longer than that for the average shopper.

Here are the questions people ask me when they are looking for a new phone, tablet or notebook.

  • Is it fast enough for me?
  • Can I store all my pictures on it?
  • Will it handle [insert favorite program] better than my old computer?
  • Can I do X, Y or Z with it?
  • Is this a good brand?

And here are the questions they don’t ask;

  • Does it have a dual core processor?
  • How much RAM does it have?

I see this more and more, whenever someone wants a new gadget, phone, computer or TV, they only want to know if it will meet their needs. Sure, there are some baseline specs that get mentioned, but these are only needed to avoid the crap that makes it onto store shelves.

AMD tried to fix this problem earlier this year with the AMD Vision program. The program had promise, but because retail employees didn’t know how to communicate the program to shoppers, and the smattering of specs that accompanied the Vision branding.

TechCrunch and Gruber are right, specs are dead and spec based reviews are flawed  – but this isn’t a new thing. If you can find an average consumer that is seriously making their next gadget purchase based on specs alone, I’ll show you a shopper who won’t be happy when they unbox their gadget and try to use it.

It’s high time more companies find ways of using their user experience to sell gadgets, and to set them apart. I have nothing against quad core smartphones, but if all the company has to sell the device is that it is a quad core phone and it has a 720P 5″ display, it’s not going to do so hot.

If companies would admit that specs are dead and buried, and focus on selling devices with a bullet point list of real features, it would make my job as family tech expert much easier, and could force intense and tangible competition that brings great new gadgets to our hands.

Josh Smith is Editor of GottaBeMobile and Notebooks.com. He's always looking for ways to help you get the most of your gear and loves to talk about tech on radio and TV. Josh uses an iOS and Android devices as well as Mac and Windows Computers. Josh Smith on Google+ Email: [email protected]

5 Comments

  1. Jad911911

    11/15/2011 at 8:26 am

    I don’t think specs are completely dead but they shouldn’t be the only highlight.  Specs should still be available for us nerds types who like to know what’s in their device.

  2. Tim Davies

    11/15/2011 at 10:13 am

    Spec’s are like the Nutritional facts on the back of foods. Not everyone looks at them, they just want a tasty meal. But those of us that “watch our specs” and know how those specs relate to our needs in a device, still need that information. If a non tech friend asked me if X device can meet there needs, I’d have to know the specs of that device to answer some questions.

  3. Anonymous

    11/15/2011 at 11:35 am

    There is one more question people ask – will it enhance my status. The same diamond ring in a blue Tiffany’s box sells for more than one in a Kay Jeweler’s box. It’s a pervasive impetus, on the high end Rolex costs more than Omega and Mont Blanc costs more than Waterman even though the products perform similarly. On the low end, a polo shirt with a Polo logo is more expensive than an identical one from Walmart or JC Penney.

    Smartphones have gotten to the point that they all do more than enough for most people. Given this, some consumers are drawn to status brands like Apple because they are status brands, not because they have better or worse specs.

Leave a Reply